Employment Relations Act 2000 — Sections 103–105

Dismissal and redundancy in New Zealand — employer obligations

Dismissing an employee in NZ without following the right process exposes you to a personal grievance claim for unjustified dismissal. Here's what the law requires.

📋 Employment Relations Act 2000, Sections 103–105 — substantive and procedural fairness

The two-part test for justified dismissal

Both substantive and procedural justification required

A dismissal is only justified if it passes both parts of the test:

  • Substantive justification: there was a genuine reason for dismissal — misconduct, poor performance, incapacity, or genuine redundancy
  • Procedural justification: the employer followed a fair process — raised the issue, gave the employee a chance to respond, genuinely considered the response

Failing either part can result in the Employment Relations Authority finding the dismissal unjustified.

Dismissal for misconduct

The fair process for misconduct dismissal

  1. Investigate the alleged misconduct — gather evidence before making any decision
  2. Notify the employee in writing of the allegation and the proposed action
  3. Give the employee a reasonable opportunity to respond — typically 48–72 hours notice of a meeting
  4. Advise the employee they can bring a support person to any meeting
  5. Hold the meeting — listen genuinely to the employee's response
  6. Consider the response with an open mind before deciding
  7. Communicate the decision in writing with reasons

Gross misconduct (theft, assault, serious dishonesty) may justify summary dismissal — but you still need to follow the process above before dismissing.

Dismissal for poor performance

Manage performance before dismissing

Dismissing someone for poor performance without prior warnings and a genuine opportunity to improve is almost always unjustified. Before dismissal for performance:

  • Raise the performance concern clearly in writing
  • Set clear, measurable expectations
  • Provide support and training
  • Allow a reasonable improvement period with regular feedback
  • If performance still doesn't improve, follow the same procedural steps as for misconduct

Redundancy

Genuine redundancy — process still required

A redundancy is a genuine restructuring where the role is no longer required. It is not a mechanism to dismiss a problem employee. For redundancy to be justified:

  • The business reason must be genuine — financial pressure, restructuring, technology change
  • The selection for redundancy must be fair — not targeting specific individuals
  • You must consult with affected employees before making the final decision
  • Consider whether alternative roles exist
  • Give the required notice period

There is no statutory redundancy payment in NZ — employees are entitled only to notice (or pay in lieu) unless the employment agreement provides for redundancy compensation.

Notice periods

Notice must be as specified in the employment agreement. The minimum under the Act is whatever notice the employee must give — it must be equal or greater. Most agreements specify 2–4 weeks. Summary dismissal for serious misconduct may allow immediate dismissal without notice — but only if justified.

Source: Employment Relations Act 2000, Sections 103–105. Employment NZ: employment.govt.nz. This is general information — get specialist employment law advice before dismissing an employee.

Frequently asked questions

What are the remedies for unjustified dismissal?
The ERA can order: reinstatement, reimbursement of lost wages (up to 3 months), compensation for humiliation and loss of dignity (up to $30,000), and contribution to legal costs. The employer may also be required to pay a penalty.
Can we dismiss someone without warning for serious misconduct?
You can still dismiss without prior written warnings — but you must still follow the procedural fairness steps: investigate, notify, give opportunity to respond, genuinely consider. Skipping the process is the most common reason employers lose ERA cases.
What if the employee refuses to attend the disciplinary meeting?
Document the refusal and the opportunity given. You can proceed to make your decision in their absence — but ensure you gave them fair notice, the opportunity to bring a support person, and adequate time to prepare.
Does redundancy pay have to be offered?
Not by law. Only if the employment agreement or collective agreement specifies redundancy compensation. However, offering something may be expected for long-serving employees and can reduce personal grievance risk.

HR teams: answer employment law questions instantly

Workstep gives your managers instant answers from the Employment Relations Act and your own HR policies — before they make a costly mistake.

Try Workstep free → Book a 20-minute demo